By Ian Worthington
Is entire advisor to historic Greek rhetoric is outstanding either in its chronological diversity and the breadth of subject matters it covers. strains the increase of rhetoric and its makes use of from Homer to Byzantium Covers wider-ranging issues similar to rhetoric's dating to wisdom, ethics, faith, legislations, and emotion contains new fabric giving us clean insights into how the Greeks observed and used rhetoric Discusses the assumption of rhetoric and examines the prestige of rhetoric experiences, current and destiny All quotations from historic assets are translated into English
Read or Download A Companion to Greek Rhetoric PDF
Best rhetoric books
The "Second Sophistic" regularly refers to a interval on the peak of the Roman Empire's energy that witnessed a flourishing of Greek rhetoric and oratory, and because the nineteenth century it has usually been seen as a protection of Hellenic civilization opposed to the domination of Rome. This e-book proposes a really various version.
Remedy of mistakes bargains a pragmatic, well-reasoned account of what academics of multilingual writers want to know approximately mistakes and the way to place what they comprehend to exploit. As within the first variation, Ferris back persuasively addresses the basic errors remedy questions that plague beginner and specialist writing experts alike: What kinds of error should still academics reply to?
This ebook addresses (and goals to dismantle) author woundedness, a nation of being that forestalls scholars from trusting themselves as in a position to writing anything they could be ok with. Wounded Writers Ask: Am I Doing it Write? invitations scholars to start a brand new writing heritage via a suite of forty eight free-writes that discover record writing, aesthetic writing, be aware craft, and writing that delves into own lifestyles tales.
This quantity supplies a theoretical account of the matter of reading and comparing argumentative discourse. After putting argumentation in a communicative point of view, after which discussing the fallacies that take place whilst convinced ideas of verbal exchange are violated, the authors provide an alternative choice to either the linguistically-inspired descriptive and logically-inspired normative ways to argumentation.
- Writing for Visual Media, Second Edition
- Centrist Rhetoric: The Production of Political Transcendence in the Clinton Presidency (Lexington Studies in Political Communication)
- Encyclopedia of Rhetoric and Composition: Communication from Ancient Times to the Information Age
- Health and the Rhetoric of Medicine
- Markets in Higer Education: Rhetoric or Reality?
Additional resources for A Companion to Greek Rhetoric
Cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-8058-1069-2 (C) 1. Persuasion (Rhetoric) 2. Fallacies (Logic) 3. Speech acts (Linguistics) 4. Communication–Philosophy. I. Grootendorst, Rob. II. Title. 41–dc20 91–40241 CIP Publisher’s Note The publisher has gone to great lengths to ensure the quality of this reprint but points out that some imperfections in the original may be apparent. ” Reasoned change in view should not be conflated with logical proof of a conclusion. In our opinion, the dissociation from logic should even be carried one step further.
7Cf. van Eemeren (1987). 8Following Toulmin (1976), one could roughly distinguish between (formal) “geometrical,” (empirical) “anthropological,” and (transcendental) “critical” perspectives on reasonableness, roughly underlying logical, rhetorical, and dialectical approaches to argumentation, respectively. 9Willard’s theory of argumentation provides a good example of an epistemo-rhetorical approach: “rhetoric as epistemic” (1989). Linking together argument and knowledge is a strategy that has been part of Willard’s rhetorical approach to rationality ever since Argumentation and the Social Grounds of Knowledge (1983).
In our opinion, the dissociation from logic should even be carried one step further. If it is argumentative inference that we are interested in, reasoned change is to be put in the context of communication where one party attempts to convince the other party of the acceptability of a standpoint. This does not mean that logic has no part to play in the study of argumentation. A difference of opinion can only be resolved if the argumentative discourse complies with a variety of norms for critical discussion.